Tonnes of
Christians are misled into accepting Descartes’ starting point, or at least into
sharing the quest for philosophical certainty, at the expense of the only
foundation for certainty, which is God. They attempt to work within these
boundaries to no avail. Creation, as Saint Athanasius recognizes, is corrupt by
virtue of its nature, and passes away like a shadow; we must assume the same for
our purely human ideas.
Isn’t cogito ergo sum correct, though? Is not our
subjective view the most immediate thing? No. Such an idea can be destroyed by
observing the simplest among us: infants, and some mentally handicapped. These
apprehend exterior things prior to the self; in fact, only by observing things
outside oneself does one come to an awareness of a subject. Augustine’s
condemnation of himself in infancy seems faulty, because the infant is perfectly
humble; never thinking himself greater nor less; doing what is necessary to
ensure his own survival and perform God’s work on earth. Of course, this is why
the Church declares that infants are free from personal sin. Now, however, we
are doubting everything except ourselves, and even ourselves, so that we are
slipping down a slope into nothingness. That Descartes spearheaded the cultural
shift toward this attitude says nothing good about his soul.
There remains one
question: which circle does Descartes occupy? I cannot say for certain, but if
he has borne the seal of the Holy priesthood of Christ, only to have thrown it
away at the cost of many souls, I would not be surprised if he is dialoguing
with the Devil himself.

No comments:
Post a Comment